Private Club - Public Concerns
The
privileged few in society born with silver spoons in their mouths and
accustomed to most of life’s offerings being handed to them on a platter are
rarely coerced into doing what goes against their wishes. Since attempting to
treat them like regular folk with accountability to others tends to be futile,
such attempts are rarely made. When someone nonetheless shows the gall to take
off kid gloves and treat the privileged few as if they are subject to the same
rules and regulations as everyone else, hell hath no fury like a spoiled brat
being told what to do.
Martha Burk of
the National Council of Women’s Organisations (NCWO) certainly understood this
when she sent a brief letter to the attention of Hootie Johnson, chairman of
the Augusta National Golf Club. In her note, she criticized Augusta’s long-standing (69 years to date)
practice of excluding women from membership in the private club. This is not to
say that Ms. Burk has a problem in general with private organizations. Most
Americans accept the fact that the Girl Scouts have the right to exclude boys,
and that college sororities should not be made to admit young men. There are
plenty of boys-only and girls-only organizations in the U.S. that are
allowed to conduct their activities hassle free. In the case of the Augusta
National Golf Club, however, this particular private club happens to host the
world-renown Masters Golf Tournament. By sponsoring one of the four major
championships in the sport of golf, for one week in every year a very public
spotlight is cast upon Augusta.
The event is televised for the viewing pleasure of millions of people who tune
in to see who will receive the coveted green jacket that is awarded to the
tournament champion. Some people feel it is reasonable to say that the Masters,
which is the youngest but also the most popular of golf’s four major
championships, is public property. And since the tournament belongs to all of
us, should it not be played at a venue that belongs (at least in theory) to all
of us?
Hootie
disagrees with the premise of this argument, and expressed his difference of
opinion to Ms. Burk’s three-sentence letter of complaint with a three-page
response of indignation. After all, for fifty-one weeks of the year Augusta is a private
club, with the emphasis on private. There is no application to obtain,
membership is offered strictly to those who are deemed worthy rather than
merely being a matter of one's ability to afford entry. For one week of the
year, Augusta
presents the world of sports with the gift of the Masters. They offer this
tournament with a lack of commercialization that has distinguished it not only
from other golf tournaments, but from all major sporting events. Unlike other
tournaments that are played on a different course each year, there are strong
ties between the Masters, the course it is played on, and the organization that
presents it. So the suggestion to simply move it elsewhere if Augusta refuses to change its policies would
be met with much resistance. Augusta and the Masters have always gone hand in
hand. Tradition serves in this matter (as it often does in the American South)
as a double edged sword, with both praise and derision earned for the same act
- standing still in a perpetually changing world. Augusta generates a sizeable chunk of change
for its efforts, so hosting the Masters is not exactly charity. According to
Johnson though, this money does not benefit the club membership, but goes back
into the tournament or is given away. He finds it unfair for Augusta to be “penalized” by having to
forfeit its private-club status because they do something that is universally
viewed as good for the game of golf with minimal compensation. So regardless of
one’s views on feminism or elitism, it seems that Hootie does have a well
thought out answer for every one of Martha’s concise charges.
Nevertheless,
Ms. Burk and the NCWO are by no means backing down. They intend to organize a
protest at next year’s (April 2003) Masters if a woman member has not been
admitted to Augusta
by then. They will certainly be joined by others, including Reverend Jesse
Jackson and his Rainbow Coalition, who are offended by the discriminatory
practices of Augusta.
As for going to the sponsors of the tournament for support, Ms. Burk need not
bother. In a pre-emptive strike, Johnson cancelled the sponsorships of Coke,
IBM and Citigroup, opting to broadcast the tournament commercial free rather
than giving them the chance to snub the Masters. So when Tiger Woods attempts
to earn a historic third consecutive green jacket, he will be doing so at a
televised but nonetheless private show being put on by a private club. There
will be picketers carrying signs and shouting disapproval, but will this be
enough to budge the obstinate Hootie Johnson? Doubtful. Mr. Johnson and the club
members that he speaks for live in a privileged world that has suited them just
fine for a long time. They are quite slow to change, as is evidenced by the
fact that it was not until 1990 that the first African-American member was
admitted. This came a full fifteen years after Lee Elders became the first
black man to play the Masters. Hootie does not rule out the possibility of a
woman gaining entrance into his club someday. But he adamantly states that
there is no chance of this event occurring prior to next Apirl, regardless of
what Martha Burk and others do or say. This is his right under the law of the
land.
To illustrate
that there is national support for Augusta’s
cause, they commissioned a poll. 74% of the respondents agreed that a private
club has the right to choose its own members, and if that means single sex
membership, so be it. Hootie further points out that women are allowed to play
the Augusta
courses, so long as they are accompanied by a member. This makes Augusta more progressive
than certain other golf clubs where women are not allowed at all. With Hootie
Johnson making several reasonable points, some people have criticized Martha
Burk for making such a big deal of this issue when there are so many situations
that seem more pertinent to the rights of women. How many lives will be
affected to a significant degree if one or two wealthy women are allowed to
become members of Augusta?
Will this truly be a major step forward for the women’s movement? Why would any
woman even want to join a club where she was so obviously not wanted? Perhaps
my last question is irrelevant. The women’s movement, like the civil rights
movement, like any movement undergone by those in a subjugated societal
position, is not about gaining admittance to places that are welcoming. Rather,
it is about forcing change against the will of those who want things to remain
as they have always been, because they are the sole beneficiaries of an
unenlightened society. Jackie Robinson did not join the Dodgers because Major
League baseball players and fans of the sport were clamoring for a black man to
take the field. He took the field, stayed on it, and excelled on it, in spite
of opposition to his presence.
Of course,
breaking the color barrier in a prominent sports league, or a school system, or
a field of employment is not exactly equivalent to getting into country club.
This is a significant point to many people, but not necessarily to Martha Burk.
Her contention that the Masters is a public rather than private event can be rightfully
disputed. She can claim however much she wants that this is a moral issue
rather than a legal one, but legality is enforceable, morality is not. It is
however rather difficult to argue against her viewpoint that the discriminatory
policies of Augusta remind women of “the glass
ceiling and unequal pay and all the reasons women are running second in America”. Such
policies remind all of us, regardless of race or religion or gender, that the
privileged few reside in a world that is above you and I, and they want it to
stay this way. For those who have a problem with this state of being, maybe it
doesn’t matter what lies behind the doors that a movement breaks through.
Perhaps it only matters that the doors go down.
No comments:
Post a Comment